Assistant Professor Casey Wichman's article on "Water Affordability in the United States" will be published in Water Resources Research. He writes:
The provision of affordable water and sewer service is a growing concern in the United States. However, the extent of the problem is not known, and the effectiveness of different policy options is underexplored.
We compile a database of water and sewer prices for approximately 45% of the United States population to estimate annual water and sewer service expenditures. We find that nearly one in ten households spend more than 4.5% of their annual household income on water and sewer services and that affordability concerns are correlated with race after conditioning on poverty levels.
Our results have implications for how to characterize water affordability and how corrective distributional policies can be designed most effectively.
From the abstract:
In the US, the cost of water and wastewater services is rising three-times faster than inflation. Over the next 20–25 years, required investments in water infrastructure are estimated to exceed $1 trillion, further increasing service costs. Combined with stagnating income levels, especially for poor households, increased costs will likely aggravate water affordability issues. Here, we document the extent of water affordability concerns in the US across income, geography, and race.
We find that 10% of households face water affordability concerns, defined as expenditures on essential water and sewer services greater than 4.5% of annual household income. Households in the lowest income decile pay on average 6.8% of their annual income on water and sewer service.
Our estimates are based on a large-scale data set on water and sewer rates matched with Census block-group-level socioeconomic characteristics and covering approximately 45% of the US population. We demonstrate that using median household income at the county level drastically understates the extent of the water affordability problem.
Additionally, we find that the number of households facing affordability concerns is positively associated with the proportion of black residents and negatively associated with Hispanic residents even after conditioning on prices and poverty levels.
Lastly, we show that self-sufficient water affordability policies that provide a lump-sum rebate to low-income households and are paid for by income taxes redistribute the burden borne by low-income customers with fewer unintended consequences for non-essential consumption than policies that change marginal incentives for water and sewer consumption.
Discover more featured research from the School of Economics, and follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn to keep up with our students, school news, and upcoming events.